Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Pastor Gas Bag Get Sand-Bagged

Photo is from Homilies and Reflections From Australia, a Catholic blog of Fr John Speekman, where he discusses the exact opposite, yet equally damnable heresy permeating many churches in the west. Go. Read.

Jeremiah Wright gets throwed under the bus with Obama's Cracker Granny.

Black & White on the Grey Matters (Jeremiah Wright)

I could vote for this guy, easily!

Listen to the whole speech by Zo, here. What a guy.

If Obama had one fraction of the kind of honesty this American citizen had, then he would get EVERYONE'S vote.

But by far, the best response has been from Baldilocks, herself:

View From Under The Bus (UPDATED)

20Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
21Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
--Matthew 7:20-21 (KJV)

Finally, I’ve finished listening to all of the Moyers interview and the batty NAACP address by Barack Obama's pastor of twenty years, Jeremiah Wright. And, in addition, I rewatched that display of ego, half-truths—aka falsehoods--and mundane bad manners from Fox that first ran live yesterday morning. And, of course, I listened to the original sermons which brought the reverend's teachings under large-scale public scrutiny. Could you have put up with Wright’s posturing in the pulpit for twenty years? Confidence and peacockery can be entertaining as long as you know and are consistently reminded of where the focal point is—or, in this case, Who it is.

I heard Wright—the self-proclaimed Christian, preacher of the Word—mention the actions and methods of Jesus Christ and those of some who purport to be his followers. (I also heard him claim that abortion was a right.) But what Wright did not talk about was the purpose of Jesus Christ and of course he wouldn't. Because that’s where Liberation Theologies and mainstream Christianity part company. That's a crucial fork in the road; one leads to Damnation while the other does not. But don’t take my word for it. You decide.

I'll tell you what: I've never heard such a long line of strawmen strung together and wrapped up in the Word of God in my life--someone at another site call it a 'Lie Burrito'--but I only have enough time to address a few items.

Excuse my English (and pardon the pun) but who gives a DAMN about skin color, type of clothing and style of music when it comes to the realm of saving souls and keeping them out of Hell? Why, Wright and BLT’s “founder” James Cone do. As a matter of fact they worship these things instead of the Creator. Wright rightfully claims that Christian missionaries of Europe fell into error and sin back when they were bent on converting the natives of all lands. Not by the act and desire of leading others to Christ, but by making Christianity about something other than Him, His Sacrifice, Resurrection and the purpose thereof. The missionaries bound up Christ in themselves and their own culture. But Wright now is mired that same error while condemning the missionaries for it out of the other side of his mouth. Beams and motes indeed.

Guys like Jeremiah Wright care about self-centric totems of race, culture and vengeance more than they care about leading their flocks down the straight and narrow path. They need these totems to fill the void of self-doubt and that need is filled by navel-gazing religions like Black Liberation Theology and one of its parents, the Nation of Islam. Yes, BLT is a progeny of the NOI, Christianity and Marxism—a bastard child, to be sure. It’s an I-deology all right and Wright has sacrificed the eternal souls of those who believe his lies and are grateful for his good works. He has sacrificed these upon the altar of race and culture. (My own pastor says that God has special plans for shepherds—pastors—who mislead their flocks.)

Wright's megalomania is such that he couldn’t even bring himself to hold his peace for Obama’s sake—that’s one of problems inherent in allying oneself with narcissists—and even had the nerve to be guarded by the Fruit of Islam, Daddy’s the Nation of Islam’s security force.
The most infuriating thing about Wright is his attempt to cover himself using other black people, black Christians, by saying that attacks on him weren’t really about him but about the ‘black church.' And then he wants to fling around epithets like "Uncle Tom."

Let's be clear. Neither blackness, African, American or European origin, American nationality or American allegiance need a defense because such a defense would inherently be just as erroneously-focused as Jeremiah Wright's jeremiad. Ethnic origins aren’t things to be defended, denigrated or repudiated or sworn allegiance to--my own heritage stems from this continent and two other continents--these things simply are; these facts are existential. Nationality is special: it’s existential but can also be voluntarily retained or released. And allegiance to any entity is entirely voluntary, but no one has to prove his/her allegiance to this country as part and parcel of a repudiation of an ethnicity or heritage. Those days went out with FDR.

Here’s what I do come to defend, to stand in defense of: Christianity and Christians who are black. Jeremiah Wright defames both and speaks for neither and little obscure me will not let him use either as fig leaf. Yes, our ancestors in this country and our kinsmen across the water fought to be just as Christian as other Christians—as Christian as our brothers who are white. And many of the latter stood for us and side-by-side with us—not because of us primarily but because of the One Who is Primary. Has that particular battle been won? I say yes, though the war continues. But Wright not only continues to fight the battle, he willfully misunderstands the nature of the War and identity of the Enemy. And by doing that, he becomes the tool of the Enemy. That’s his choice, but not mine and not that of those who focus on the Redemption offered by Christ instead of getting upon the Cross themselves.
To quote myself, there is no “black church.” There is only the Church.
Word to Obama: thanks a lot, "brotha." Nice pastor you have there.

UPDATE: Of course, just as I finish, Obama holds a press conference to distance himself from Wright.

Sorry, Senator. You can't shake off this Tar Baby that easily.

Ms. Malkin live-blogs it.

What is so important about this, is that there are many Christians of all races and nationalities who have put aside denominational differences to unite under the belief that Christ is the head of the church and they are His, regardless of history. And there are those who are uniting under a false doctrine which perpetuates grievances, pride and division amongst the brethren. The New Testament warned us clearly of dividers and of wolves in sheep's clothing.
Here is another gasbag, of a more distilled nature:

I smell Heaven's Bakery cooking up something good for you, sister!


  1. I am the Nice Shepherd. I wish I had thought of that, because it's such an awesome idea. That's almost exactly what many pastors proclaim. They have no problem with allowing the wolf to commune openly among the flock, but what they simply will not brook is anyone pointing the wolf out or anyone even advocating orthodox or traditional practices and devotions. Playing nice means anything goes except suggesting that something shouldn't go. So they refuse to welcome us because we are not welcoming like they are, as the good Australian Father says.

    That's how I got the title "Defender of the Faith," by the way. I pointed out Church law (we have rules for the sheep!) and so the Nice Shepherd, a local rector in this case, exclaimed exasperatedly to one of my students, "The pope did not appoint him (meaning me) Defender of the Faith." Fr. Nice about had an apoplexy when I told him that my appointment was from on high and that I would be pleased to step down anytime he's ready to step up.

    Anyway, your comment on my recent post was absolutely hysterical. Wherever do you get the energy?

    Hey, I noticed you also use Opera, which I don't have. (It's hard enough to work in WordPress for the three browsers I do have, so I don't think I'll be downloading Opera). But how does my site render in it? Do some things look funky, as they do in Safari?

    Just curious.

    As Arnold says, I'll be back.

  2. I like the comeback. Was his complexion as apoplexic? It is good that he is so nice as to not have you burned at the stake! Martin Luther would be proud.
    Opera...well, it has some kinks, but Firefox kept losing sound on videos and audios, no matter if I installed it and uninstalled it. Very frustrating. As for the energy, I am a night person, by nature. Until the end of March, I was up all night as a baker, and sometimes I substitute as a driver on the morning paper route. I do a lot during the day, like teaching piano to people who won't practice. I have students who do, and they get stickers, but the ones who don't - get nothing. No stickers. NOTHING!


Don't just sit there, say something!